Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine never tested for effect on transmission: Pfizer executive

May 28, 2023

On 10 October 2022 one Janine Small, President of International Developed Markets at Pfizer, while questioned by Rob Roos, a Dutch parliamentarian, had stated that prior to the rollout of the Pfizer's mRNA COVID-19 vaccine said vaccine had not been assessed in terms of how effective it would be at stopping the transmission of COVID. Let me say that again: an alleged vaccine was rolled out without the manufacturer (or anyone else, I might add) having any idea as to whether or not it would help stop or slow down the disease the vaccine was allegedly designed to work against. And this is not me talking, this is a C-level executive at the major international pharmaceutical company producing that vaccine.

As Mr Roos and many others have stated afterwards, the whole idea of vaccine passports and mandates was founded on the idea that the vaccine would stop the transmission. If that expectation was not backed by research then for that reason alone they were scandalous if not outright criminal. That is, if what Ms Small had stated was accurate. But was it?

Judging by her LinkedIn profile, Janine Small had spent pretty much her whole professional life working for Pfizer (over 26 years from 1988 to present, with a few years unaccounted for during that time period). She obtained a degree in Chemistry from University of Leeds in England in 1985 but spent her time at Pfizer, the only professional experience she lists on her LinkedIn profile working on the business and management side of things. So it is possible she would not be fully informed of the research conducted by the business - though clearly she should. But communication breaks between R&D and the management is not uncommon. However, given the scandalous nature of her admission, if it were wrong Pfizer would be expected to issue a very loud and very clear clarification. Best I can tell, no rebuttal or clarification of tat kind was ever issued by Pfizer. Not only that, but even some pro-Pfizer's vaccine "fact checkers" state that yes, things went exactly as described by Ms Small but that is no cause for concern because, as Small herself stated, Pfizer only worried about the safety of the vaccine and the suppression of symptoms, not about the transmission.

So I will leave you with this: people were encouraged, sometimes told to take an experimental drug that was not known to slow down he spread of the disease - and may actually have had an opposite effect. People lost jobs, access o services, etc. based on a mandate based on no knowledge. What you should make of that is for you to decide.

As always - do your own research, use your own brain, reach your own conclusions.